Tuesday, April 25, 2017

Dr. Eowyn: U.S. government has engaged in weather modification since 1953

 

Not a conspiracy theory but a fact!

A recent article in New York Times Magazine of April 18, 2017, asks if it’s O.K. “to tinker with the environment to fight climate change”.
Tinkering with the environment is another way of saying “weather modification“.
The NYT article by Jon Gertner describes Harvard professor David Keith’s proposal of a continuous “solar engineering” project to slow down global warming, at a cost of $1 billion a year, by flying ten Gulfstream jets around the world, spraying 25,000 tons of liquid sulphur gas. The gas will condense into airborne particles that scatter sunlight and so reduce global warming. Keith argues such a project is technologically feasible, but is concerned, as he puts it, about “the ethics about messing with nature.”
Chemtrails over Barcelona, Spain
What neither Keith nor reporter Gertner seems to know (or pretend they don’t know) is that the U.S. government has been engaged in “tinkering with the environment” or weather modification since 1953, as revealed in a recently uncovered 784-page U.S. Senate report, Weather Modification: Programs, Problems, Policy, and Potential (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington: May 1978).
Here are some highlights from that report:
(1) The U.S. government has been doing weather modification since 1953 (p. v of Weather Modification):
In a letter addressed to Dr. Norman A. Beckman, Acting Director, Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress, Sen. James B. Pearson wrote: “weather modification projects have been operational for nearly 25 years and have been shown to have significant potential for preventing, diverting, moderating, or ameliorating the adverse effects of such weather related disasters and hazards”. Pearson’s “greatest concern” is “regarding the lack of a coordinated Federal weather modification policy and a coordinated and comprehensive program for weather modification research and development.” It is that concern that prompted Sen. Pearson to ask the Congressional Research Service to prepare the Weather Modification: Programs, Problems, Policy, and Potential report.
Note: James Pearson was a U.S. senator (R-Kansas) from 1962 to 1978. He introduced and sponsored senate bill S.3383 “National Weather Modification Policy Act”. Written into Public Law 94-490 on October 13, 1976, S.3383 authorized a member of the cabinet to “negotiate an International agreement concerning the peaceful uses of weather modification”.
(2) Definition of weather modification (from “Summary and Conclusions,” p. xix):
“Weather modification is generally considered to be the deliberate effort to improve atmospheric conditions for beneficial human purposes—to augment water supplies through enhanced precipitation or to reduce economic losses, property damages, and deaths through mitigation of adverse effects of hail, lightning, fog, and severe storms.”

(3) Modern, scientific methods of weather modification (from “Summary and Conclusions,” pp. xix-xx):
  • The modern period in weather modification began in 1946 with cloud seeding using dry ice, then silver iodide.
  • Beginning in the 1950s, there were projects to alter severe storm effects. Commercial weather modifiers also began.
  • By 1978 when the Senate report was published, weather modification included cold fog clearing; “primitive” efforts to abate severe storms and hurricanes; increase winter snowpack by seeding clouds in the mountains on the U.S. west coast and in Israel to enhance precipitation by as much as 15% over “natural” rainfall; opening holes (via seeding) in wintertime cloud layers in northeast U.S. so as to increase sunshine and decrease energy consumption; and experiments to suppress lightning by seeding thunderstorms.
(4) U.S. government involvement in weather modification (from “Summary and Conclusions,” pp. xxi-xxvi):
  • “For over 30 years both legislative and executive branches of the Federal Government have been involved in a number of aspects of weather modification.”
  • Since 1947, more than 110 weather modification bills and resolutions have been introduced in Congress — for research support, operations, grants, policy studies, regulations, liabilities, activity reporting, international concerns, and using weather modification as a weapon. Some of the bills became laws.
  • Total funding for Federal weather modification research reached a high point of $20 million in fiscal year 1976, falling to $17 million in fiscal year 1978.
  • While each federal government agency conducts its own weather modification research, the National Science Foundation is the lead agency. The NSF and the Departments of Interior and Commerce account for the largest weather modification programs.
  • State governments, universities, private institutions and commercial entities (e.g., airlines) also conduct their own weather modification projects, mostly to increase precipitation, suppression of hail or dispersal of fog.
(5) Global warming from human behaviors that may inadvertently cause weather modification (from “Summary and Conclusions,” pp. xxi):
“Modification processes may also be initiated or triggered inadvertently rather than purposefully, and the possibility exists that society may be changing the climate through its own actions by pushing on certain leverage points. Inadvertently, man is already causing measurable variations on the local scale. Artificial climatic effects have been observed and documented on local and regional scales, particularly in and downwind of heavily populated industrial areas where waste heat, particulate pollution and altered ground surface characteristics are primarily responsible for the perceived climate modification. The climate in and near large cities, for example, is warmer, the daily range of temperature is less, and annual precipitation is greater than if the cities had never been built. Although not verifiable at present, the time may not be far off when human activities will result in measurable large-scale changes in weather and climate of more than passing significance. It is important to appreciate the fact that the role of man at this global level is still controversial, and existing models of the general circulation are not yet capable of testing the effects in a conclusive manner. Nevertheless, a growing fraction of current evidence does point to the possibility of unprecedented impact on the global climate by human activities ….”
(6) Weather modification is international (from “Summary and Conclusions,” pp. xxvii):
  • While the U.S. is the leader in weather modification research and operations, other countries conduct weather modification as well, but not all governments report that they do.
  • The largest country outside of U.S. was the Soviet Union.
  • Other major weather modification countries are Canada, Israel, Mexico, China.
(7) Weather modification is controversial and has opposition (from “Summary and Conclusions,” pp. xxvii):
“Weather modification is often controversial, and both formal and informal opposition groups have been organized in various sections of the country. Reasons for such opposition are varied and are based on both real and perceived adverse consequences from weather modification. Sometimes with little or no rational basis there are charges by these groups that otherwise unexplained and usually unpleasant weather-related events are linked to cloud seeding. There are also cases where some farmers are economically disadvantaged through receiving more, or less than optimum rainfall for their particular crops, when artificial inducement of such conditions may have indeed been planned to benefit those growing different crops with different moisture requirements.
(8) Weather modification as a weapon of war (from “Summary and Conclusions,” pp. xix, xxviii):
  • “Not all weather modification activities, however, have been or can be designed to benefit everyone, and some intentional operations have been used, or are perceived to have been used, as a weapon of war to impede the mobility or tactical readiness of an enemy.”
  • The U.S. used weather modification as a weapon of war in Vietnam: “attempts were made to impede traffic by increasing rainfall during the monsoon season.”
  • Expect weather warfare between nations in the future.
  • There have been international efforts to ensure peaceful use of weather modification.
  • “Because atmospheric processes operate independent of national borders, weather modification is inherently of international concern…. Whereas domestic weather modification law is confused
    and unsettled, international law in this area is barely in the formative stage. In time, ramifications of weather modification may lead to major international controversy.
(9) Weather modification will have unintended ecological effects (from “Summary and Conclusions,” pp.xxix-xxx):
“Economically significant weather modification activities will have an eventual ecological effect, though appearance of that effect may be hidden or delayed…. Deliberate weather modification, such as precipitation augmentation, is likely to have a greater ecological impact in semi-arid regions than in humid ones.”
Dane Wigington of geoengineeringwatch.org asks:
How big does the climate engineering elephant in the room need to be before it can no longer be hidden in plain site? How much more historical proof do we need of the ongoing climate engineering/weather warfare before the denial of the masses crumbles? When will populations around the globe bring to justice all those responsible for the ongoing and rapidly worsening worldwide weather warfare assault?
And so, the next time you’re mocked and called a “conspiracy theorist” because you bring up chemtrails or HAARP or California’s peculiar historic 100-year drought, show them this post. They are the ones in denial, not us.
See also:
~Eowyn
Dr. Eowyn’s post originally appeared at Fellowship of the Minds

Thursday, April 20, 2017

What happened to Donald Trump? The ‘Kushner Coup’ inside The White House

 

A very stealthy and slow-motion coup has been executed in Washington, D.C. The coup plotters staked out the West Wing long before Donald Trump ever set foot in the Oval Office.


This still ongoing coup has been a fairly quiet affair because it took place within Trump’s own family first.  The prime mover of this overthrow is arch-Zionist Neocon Jared Kushner.  His wife — Ivanka Trump – is also playing a crucial role, specifically as her father’s “most trusted advisor”.  As always, there are numerous agents of Deep State who are assisting with the clockwork implementation of every aspect of the takeover.
Jared Corey Kushner is the son of Charles Kushner, a heretofore major contributor, bundler and bagman for the Democratic Party.  So loyal was he to the Democrats that he went to prison for an illegal campaign finance scheme and the subsequent cover-up crimes.

Jared Kushner: Boy with a mission

If this bloodless coup d’état has one foreign agent who has deeply infiltrated the Trump Administration, it is Jared Kushner, a hardcore Zionist Neocon.  Although unusually young at 36-years old, his adulthood experience is quite deep in causes that advance Zionist extremism.
Kushner was primed for the advocacy of Jewish Zionism during his college years. His involvement with the college-based Chabad was a particularly important part of his resumé-building.  Chabad House is well known to be an outreach arm of Zionist extremism.  It’s common knowledge within intelligence circles that Chabad Houses worldwide provide safe haven to Israeli agents (especially the notorious Sayanim) during times of urgent need.[1]
The Chabad Lubavitch sect is an extremely radical organization that espouses dogmatic end-time prophecies that are overwhelmingly favorable to the Jewish race.  However, their real work is better understood by those members who often appear to function as an extension of the MOSSAD.  Although religious by their own description, the Chabad House leader in Washington, D.C. — Levi Shemtov — is one of the biggest political operators Inside the Beltway.

Is Trump’s Jared Kushner connection to the Chabad Lubavitch sect
the cause for his dramatic U-turn?  
The sect is deliberately fomenting
a prophesied Third World War.

In the ‘advisor’ of Jared Kushner, everything points to an individual who was strategically positioned within the Trump family to achieve the eventual and total control of White House.  It appears that he has almost accomplished that lofty goal as of April 13th, 2017. But who is he really working for?  His carefully constructed political network tells the story.
In order to better understand just how complete the Trump administration takeover is, the following two exposés are offered for their penetrating insights.  Each one provides a different but vital perspective on what is now known as the “Kushner coup”.

Soros’ Inside Man

The Right should have known that Jared Kushner was the Democrat’s inside man planted within Team Trump.  After all, Kushner and his brother Joshua received a $250 million investment from the Godfather of Liberalism himself—George Soros.
Hence, it was only a matter of time before the key planks of Donald Trump’s oft-repeated campaign platform were converted into political firewood.  The April 6 missile attack was intentionally staged not only to reignite the Syrian War, it has moved the president’s domestic agenda to the back burner. Even the high crimes of WitetapGate have been conveniently pushed off the front pages, now likely to be forgotten.
The growing threats of a Purple Revolution were purposefully fabricated as an incentive for Trump to relinquish and/or trash his most important campaign promises. Fictitious MSM polls pushed his approval ratings to unprecedented lows in order to encourage Team Trump to make a dramatic foreign policy shift.  Warmongering almost always engenders fake patriotism that creates reflexive support for a sitting POTUS.
Even the MSM reported that it was daughter Ivanka who convinced Trump to launch the illegal missile strikes against Syria.[2]  Given her conversion to husband Jared’s extreme form of Jewish Zionism, it ought to be obvious who influenced Ivanka.
Welcome to the Kushner presidency!

Conclusion

Everything has changed.
With such an egregious and indisputable war crime committed against Syria hanging over his head for the next 4 years, Trump is toast.  He killed his presidency with one fatal blunder and exceedingly reckless mistake.
No matter what Trump does from this point forward, he has proven himself to be a pathological liar who cannot be trusted.  He has likewise staffed his administration with serial prevaricators.  Trump’s blind rush to judgment, without any factual evidence whatsoever, reveals him to be without conscience and devoid of common sense.
Given this unfortunate state of affairs, the American people are effectively leaderless once again.  In the ensuing chaos, the nation is being stampeded into more foreign wars on behalf of Israel.  Trump has been relegated to nothing more than a puny pitchman for the Greater Israel project.  And his prominently positioned son-in-law is but a messenger boy relaying the orders from Tel Aviv. (See: The New White House Chain of Command)
State of the NationApril 13, 2017
Editor’s Note
The following article lays bare Jared Kushner’s extremely telling journalistic agenda, particularly regarding the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.  He is the owner and publisher of the New York Observer which he bought at age 25 for $10,000,000.  There is perhaps no more dangerous truth to the Zionist Neocon agenda than 9/11 truth.  Is this why the Observer has consistently published articles which ridicule ‘truthers’?[2]  After all, theirs is a massive body of conclusive evidence that contains deep research and high-integrity investigations which link Israel directly to the 9/11 false flag operation.
Source
Recommended Reading
References

Monday, April 17, 2017

Paul Craig Roberts: The Boston Bombing after Four Years

Today, April 15, 2017, is the fourth anniversary of the Boston Marathon Bombing, a hoax event performed by crisis actors and tell-tale bright red Hollywood blood. Sheila Casey has done a good job of exposing the hoax just by using the time line and photos of the event.
 A number of agencies run training programs in which amputees working as crisis actors have a prosthesis afixed to resemble a bone as a remaining piece of a leg or arm. Casey examines the Boston event by timeline. First the crisis actors are assembled. Then the prosthesis is attached. Then the blood appears. 
Notice the photo of Miracle Man laying on his side clutching the back of his left thigh with a straight line sticking out from what appears to be below his knee. This does not resemble a leg bone. Moreover, a person with an injury this severe would not be conscious, and certainly he would not be ignored while aid workers attended to those with lesser injuries. Note also the bright red color of what is pretending to be blood. Many surgeons and trauma medical personnel have testified that blood spilled in injuries is dark red.
[Editor's note: For those who would benefit from an introduction to the case, watch:
Sheila Casey walks you through the hoax. I am convinced that the only victims of the Boston Marathon bombing were the framed Tsarnaev brothers. The older brother was murdered in captivity. The younger brother was also supposed to be killed in the alleged shoot-out with the police, but the operation was botched. The younger brother survived a second episode of police shooting. He was taken into custody, held incommunicato, and assigned an attorney who participated in his conviction. He now awaits execution as his appeals are denied. No one has ever heard his story. We only have alleged confessions, including one allegedly written in his own blood in total darkness as he lay bleeding under the boat where he was found and shot again. 
John Remington Graham has filed evidence with the court proving the younger brother’s innocence. [Editor's note: As he emphasized to me, the key observation is that the backpacks don't match, which means that there was not even probable cause for an arrest, much less an indictment and conviction at trial. 
 The backpacks that exploded were black nylon, but neither of the brothers was wearing one.]
A person has to be extremely gullible and inattentive to believe the official story. But that is what most Americans are.