Monday, July 24, 2017

Threat to free speech: Unconstitutional S720/HR1697 will make it a felony to support anti-Israel boycott


Dr. Eowyn

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, adopted in 1791, states:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
 
The criminalization of political speech and activism against Israel has become one of the gravest threats to free speech in the West:
  • In France, activists have been arrested and prosecuted for wearing T-shirts advocating a boycott of Israel.
  • The U.K. has also enacted a series of measures designed to outlaw such activism.
  • In the U.S., state governors have implemented regulations barring businesses from participating in any boycotts of Israeli settlements in Palestine. On college campuses, punishment of pro-Palestinian students for expressing criticisms of Israel is so commonplace that the Center for Constitutional Rights refers to it as “the Palestine Exception” to free speech.
Now there are two companion bills in Congress which will criminalize free speech by making it a felony to support any boycott of Israel, in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment that members of Congress have sworn to protect.

The bills are S.720 and its companion in the House, H.R. 1697, with an identical name, the Israel Anti-Boycott Act.

Here’s the text of S 720:
Israel Anti-Boycott Act
This bill declares that Congress: (1) opposes the United Nations Human Rights Council resolution of March 24, 2016, which urges countries to pressure companies to divest from, or break contracts with, Israel; and (2) encourages full implementation of the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2014 through enhanced, governmentwide, coordinated U.S.-Israel scientific and technological cooperation in civilian areas.
The bill amends the Export Administration Act of 1979 to declare that it shall be U.S. policy to oppose:
  • requests by foreign countries to impose restrictive practices or boycotts against other countries friendly to the United States or against U.S. persons; and
  • restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or imposed by an international governmental organization, or requests to impose such practices or boycotts, against Israel.
The bill prohibits U.S. persons engaged in interstate or foreign commerce from:
  • requesting the imposition of any boycott by a foreign country against a country which is friendly to the United States; or
  • supporting any boycott fostered or imposed by an international organization, or requesting imposition of any such boycott, against Israel.
The bill amends the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 to include as a reason for the Export-Import Bank to deny credit applications for the export of goods and services between the United States and foreign countries, opposition to policies and actions that are politically motivated and are intended to penalize or otherwise limit commercial relations specifically with citizens or residents of Israel, entities organized under the laws of Israel, or the Government of Israel.
S 720’s companion bill, HR 1697, is much longer. It explains that:
“For a half century, Congress has combated anti-Israel boycotts and other discriminatory activity under the Export Administration Act of 1979.”
HR 1697 also specifies the punishment for violating the Israel Anti-Boycott Act, to be a minimum civil penalty of $250,000, and a maximum criminal penalty of $1 million and 20 years in prison:
Whoever knowingly violates or conspires to or attempts to violate any provision of section 8(a) [of the Export Administration act of 1979] or any regulation, order, or license issued thereunder shall be fined in accordance with section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705).”
And what are those penalties? From 50 U.S.C. 1705:
“(b) Civil penalty
A civil penalty may be imposed on any person who commits an unlawful act described in subsection (a) in an amount not to exceed the greater of- (1) $250,000; or (2) an amount that is twice the amount of the transaction that is the basis of the violation with respect to which the penalty is imposed.
(c) Criminal penalty
A person who willfully commits, willfully attempts to commit, or willfully conspires to commit, or aids or abets in the commission of, an unlawful act described in subsection (a) shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $1,000,000, or if a natural person, may be imprisoned for not more than 20 years, or both.”
Both bills have widespread bipartisan support:

(1) S 720 was introduced by Sen. Benjamin Cardin (D-MD) and has 45 co-sponsors:
  • 31 Republicans: John Boozman (AR), Richard Burr (NC), Shelley Moore Capito (WV), Bill Cassidy (LA), Susan Collins (ME), John Cornyn (TX), Tom Cotton (AR), Mike Crapo (IA), Ted Cruz (TX), Deb Fischer (NE), Lindsey Graham (SC), Chuck Grassley (IA), Orrin Hatch (UT), Dean Heller (NV), John Hoeven (ND), Johnny Isakson (GA), James Lankford (OK), Jerry Moran (KS), David Perdue (GA), Rob Portman (OH), Pat Roberts (KS), Marco Rubio (FL), Ben Sasse (NE), Tim Scott (SC), Luther Strange (AL), Dan Sullivan (AR), John Thune (SD), Thom Tillis (NC), Roger Wicker (MS), Todd Young (IN).
  • 14 Democrats: Michael Bennet (CO), Richard Blementhal (CT), Maria Cantwell (WA), Christopher Coons (DE), Joe Donnelly (IN), Joni Ernst (IA), Kristen Gillibrand (NY), Margaret Wood Hassan (NH), Joe Manchin (WV), Claire McCaskill (MO), Robert Menendez (NJ), Bill Nelson (FL), Gary Peters (MI), Charles Schumer (NY), Ron Wyden (OR).
(2) HR1697 was introduced by Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) and has 240 co-sponsors:
  • 177 Republicans
  • 63 Democrats
S 720 was referred to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on March 23, 2017. Its companion bill, HR 1697, was referred to House Financial Services Committee also on March 23, 2017.

The Jewish Telegraphic Agency reports on July 20, 2017, that HR 1697/S 720 “was drafted with the assistance of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee” (AIPAC). Indeed, AIPAC’s 2017 lobbying agenda identifies passage of this bill as one of its top lobbying priorities for the year.

The two bills that will make it a felony if you support any boycott of Israel also have the support of the thoroughly-cucked Christians United for Israel.

Did you know that, according to a list compiled in 2012, there are 41 members of Congress (29 in the House; 12 in the Senate) who have dual US-Israeli citizenship, which means they have dual loyalties?


The above list is dated in that Barney Frank, Henry Waxman and Anthony Weiner are no longer representatives.

 

Though not on the list, Sen. Benjamin Cardin (D-MD), 73, who introduced S720, is Jewish — his grandparents were Russian Jewish immigrants. The family name was originally Kardonsky.

In 2015, Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL), 55, who introduced HR 1697, wrote a letter to the New York Times condemning the paper for a graphic on members of Congress opposed to Obama’s Iran nuclear agreement, which initially identified Jewish lawmakers with a bold yellow highlight. Roskam, who opposed the nuclear deal, called the graphic “anti-Semitic” and that it “feeds the canard of dual loyalty that legitimizes prejudice toward Jews worldwide.”

What is needed is an updated list. Alas, as L. Michael Hager — co-founder and former director general of the International Development Law Organization, Rome — discovered, it is extremely difficult to identify members of Congress who hold dual citizenship and to ascertain the second nationality of those members.

In October 2014, Hagen filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the Congressional Research Service (CRS) for the names of members of Congress with dual citizenship. In January 2015, he finally got a non-answer in a telephone call from a legal officer of the Library of Congress. After reminding Hagen that Congress and the CRS by extension are exempt from FOIA requests, the officer said CRS does not collect dual citizenship data.

Hagen writes:
“That’s bad news for those of us who believe that citizens should know if their representatives in Congress (and senior government officials and judges, for that matter) owe allegiance to any other nation….
Without transparency on dual citizenship, Americans remain in the dark, free to speculate on which representatives may have divided loyalties…. The lack of transparency is dangerous, for it erodes trust in government, creating credibility doubts where there should be none and allowing some conflicts to continue undetected, without question or debate.
Thus the first requirement is transparency. We need a government agency (presumably the CRS) or a non-governmental organization to disclose the names and non-U.S. national affiliations of Members of Congress and senior government officials and to track and report on this issue.
Secondly, we need more media attention to the subject of dual citizenship….
Beyond the threshold issue of transparency are equally important questions of whether a dual citizen elected to Congress or appointed to a senior USG position should be required to renounce his or her citizenship in the second nation. Even if American law continues to allow the government service of dual citizens, should it not require such persons at least to recuse themselves from participating in decisions or policy debates that relate to their second nationality?….
Conflicts of interest and apparent conflicts by public officials erode trust in government. Allowing dual citizenship in Congress (and in the Executive and Judicial Branches) to flourish under cover of non-disclosure puts our democracy at risk.
It’s time to bring this issue into open debate.”
See also:
~Eowyn

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Silencing the Truth? The Mainstream Media Declares War on the Alternative Media


When it came to the art of lying to the public, German politician and Reich Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels said it best:
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.
The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
Since World War II, the U.S. government has been involved in numerous wars and orchestrated coups in more than fifty countries based on fabricated lies created mainly by the CIA to destroy or remove governments not subservient to Washington’s interests. Goebbels knew that “the lie can be maintained only for such time.”
And time and time again, the mainstream-media (MSM) has been exposed as an agent of propaganda. For example, at the start of the Vietnam War, the U.S. government was supplying the MSM with information on the Gulf of Tonkin incident and they accepted it without question. On August 5th, 1964, The Washington Post headlined ‘American Planes Hit North Vietnam After Second Attack on Our Destroyers; Move Taken to Halt New Aggression.’ Other MSM sources followed with similar headlines. Washington’s official story was that on August 2nd, the North Vietnamese torpedo boats launched an “unprovoked attack” against the U.S. destroyer Maddox that was supposedly on a routine patrol in the Gulf of Tonkin. Two days later, another so-called “deliberate attack” was committed by North Vietnamese PT boats.
All the claims by the U.S. government and the MSM were based on lies. In fact, the U.S. destroyer Maddox was engaged in an intelligence-gathering mission that also helped coordinate attacks with the South Vietnamese navy and the Laotian air force against the North Vietnamese forces. The result of the lie ended with more than 50,000 U.S. deaths and millions of Vietnamese casualties. According to the Vietnam Red Cross, over 3 million Vietnamese including 150,000 children were affected with Agent Orange chemicals sprayed on the countryside by the U.S. Air Force to eliminate forest cover for North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong troops since the war ended in 1975. Agent Orange was also used to destroy crops that were meant to feed the Viet Cong. Numerous books had been published on the lies that led to the Vietnam War. One of the books, ‘The Uncensored War: The Media and Vietnam’ by Daniel Hallin who said journalists had “a great deal of information available which contradicted the official account [of Tonkin Gulf events]; it simply wasn’t used” Hallin claimed.
The lies perpetrated by MSM are a component of the Military-Industrial Complex. The MSM is a public relations firm that represents the establishment’s hidden agenda disguised as a noble cause to spread “American style democracy” to the rest of the world. Without the MSM, wars cannot be waged. Wars are based on the lies and deceptions provided by Washington and their special interest groups (corporations, lobbyists, etc..) therefore, the MSM’s job is to win the “hearts and minds” of the public with propaganda. Without public support, the U.S. government cannot engage in its imperial wars like they did in Vietnam. On the ‘Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs’ website under the United States Department of State archived the results of the Harris Poll documenting public support for the U.S. government’s bombing campaign against North Vietnam: ‘Memorandum from the President’s Special Assistant for National Security Affairs (Bundy) to President Johnson’ on June 30, 1965 under the subject ‘France in Vietnam, 1954, and the U.S. in Vietnam, 1965—A Useful Analogy? Stated the following:
The latest Harris Poll (June 28) shows that 62% of the public expresses overall approval of the President’s handling of the Vietnam crisis. Well over 70% of the people believe that Southeast Asia will go Communist if we do not stand firm in Vietnam, and they approve the President’s call for unconditional negotiations. Twenty-three percent are not sure about bombings in the North or the sending of more troops during the monsoon season. However, of those with an opinion, almost 80 percent approve of the bombing and over 60 percent believe we should send more troops
The war in Iraq with the “Weapons of Mass Destruction” hoax with help from The New York Times also convinced the public to support the Bush administration’s Neocon agenda to remove Saddam Hussein. The American public fell for another lie and what was the outcome? A disastrous war that left Iraq permanently fragmented. The Iraq war created more terrorist networks that happen to be supported by the U.S. government and its allies ready to destroy other sovereign nations in the Middle East including Syria. The Iraq war also created a refugee crisis and impoverished Iraqi society for future generations.
Goebbels’s claimed that the state can lie and keep that lie going, however, they can only maintain the lie only for so long until the public (with help from the alternative media) can expose their lies. The consequences of MSM propaganda has led to wars of conquest, theft by Wall Street megabanks, demonizing their perceived enemies both foreign and domestic, promoting the phony war on drugs and the list goes on. The MSM has been exposed, they are in panic so what are they to do? Goebbels had said “It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
Hillary Clinton recently made it clear that the truth by the alternative media is the enemy of the state. Clinton recently came out from her cave and blames the alternative media for her loss to Donald Trump during a ceremony for Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada), who is retiring from Congress. The queen of lies said
“The epidemic of malicious fake news and false propaganda that flooded social media over the past year — it’s now clear that so-called fake news can have real-world consequences.”
Clinton actually has the audacity to claim that the alternative news on social media (that has exposed the U.S. government‘s crimes against humanity in the past and present) has “real world consequences.
What does she mean by real world consequences? Does she mean the war she waged on Libya by the US-NATO alliance during her time as Secretary of State under the Obama administration that caused the deaths of thousands of people and displaced millions more who is now flooding the shores of the European Union? Or does she mean the total destruction of one of the wealthiest nations in North Africa that was economically independent with its own money, its own water resources, its own oil reserves and even its own central bank?
Does eliminating the benefits of a nation that once provided its citizens with a free education, healthcare and having a home of your own which was considered a human right has “real world consequences”? How about the real world consequences of the lies that destroyed a once prosperous and stable nation that created a new breed of terrorists which helped form the Islamic State that currently engulfs the Middle East, including Syria? So who’s fake news and lies had real world consequences Hillary? It sure wasn’t the alternative media. Maybe Clinton should ask the Libyan people whose policies have wretched havoc on their lives. Last August, Martin Kobler, the United Nations secretary general’s special representative for Libya said “More than 2.4 million people in Libya are in need of humanitarian assistance.” Clinton and the establishment’s hypocrisy are astonishing. According to an RT News report back in October 28th, 2011 appropriately titled ‘Biggest success? NATO proud of Libya op which killed thousands’ reported on what Bishop Giovanni Innocenzo Martinelli, Apostolic Vicar of Tripoli had observed during his time in Libya:
Speaking on March 31, Bishop Giovanni Innocenzo Martinelli, Apostolic Vicar of Tripoli, reported that “the so-called humanitarian air raids have taken the lives of dozens of civilians in various areas of Tripoli.” The senior cleric went on to say “in the district of Buslim, a building collapsed because of the bombing, killing 40 people,” as cited by Agenzia Fedes, the information service of the Pontifical Mission Societies. However, despite the decision to turn a blind eye to the casualty figures, one of the few instances the alliance could not deny culpability in was a June 19 NATO missile strike that resulted in the deaths of nine civilians.
Attacks of this nature were happening on a daily basis throughout the intense bombing campaign. Speaking in September, the health minister in the new Libyan government estimated that at least 30,000 people had been killed and 50,000 wounded during the first six months of the war. Some, however, have estimated that the real figure could be much higher
Of the thousands of emails released by Wikileaks from Hillary Clinton’s private email server in late December 2015, one in particular stood out it in regards to why Gaddafi was a target for regime change. According to an email sent to Clinton from Sidney Blumenthal, a former assistant and senior adviser to Bill Clinton who worked for the Clinton Foundation from 2009 until 2013 exposed the real reason to remove Gaddafi from power:
On April 2, 2011 sources with access to advisors to Saif al-Islam Qaddafi stated in strictest confidence that while the freezing of Libya’s foreign bank accounts presents Muammar Qaddafi with serious challenges, his ability to equip and maintain his armed forces and intelligence services remains intact. According to sensitive information available to this these individuals, Qaddafi’s government holds 143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver. During late March, 2011 these stocks were moved to SABHA (south west in the direction of the Libyan border with Niger and Chad); taken from the vaults of the Libyan Central Bank in Tripoli. 
This gold was accumulated prior to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African currency based on the Libyan golden Dinar. This plan was designed to provide, the Francophone African Countries with an alternative to the French franc (CFA)
The truth to the matter regarding what Hillary Clinton said about “real-world consequences” regarding social media and the onslaught of fake news is ludicrous. It was Clinton’s lies that led to the death of Libyan President Muammar Gaddafi and the total destruction of Libya, not the alternative media.
The MSM is exposed. They lost control of the narrative. The alternative media is growing with an array of independent news organizations, websites, bloggers, citizen journalists and a public that is sick and tired of the lies who just want the truth. If they (Western governments including the U.S.) were to manage to censor the alternative media which will be difficult to do, there will be other ways to inform the public. Remember the printing press? Then again, the MSM will be in a full-blown panic as their newspaper sales continue to plummet. Viewership for the MSM on basic television and cable has declined dramatically thanks to the internet.
One other important note to consider, instead of being objective, the MSM, particularly in the U.S. had sided with Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump during the elections, since then, it all has been downhill for the MSM. No one can trust the MSM and they never should. Welcome to the alternative world where once, the dinosaur media roamed the earth and are now are going extinct, a new breed of journalism and the quest for truth is here to stay. Throughout my life, people always told me that we can never change the world because it is filled with evil people that will do anything to remain in power even if it means lying to the public. That may be true to a point, but I don’t believe that we as a people cannot change the course of history because the ruling elites from past imperial powers to the present American Empire have always lied to the people to advance their agendas, now we are turning the tide. I have hope in humanity because the truth is the foundation of humanity. My friends, it’s up to us, the people, to tell the truth to power because the lies perpetrated by the MSM have led the world to endless wars, poverty and a self-absorbed society based on useless consumption.
The cadre of MSM organizations and personalities including losers like former NBC Nightly news host Brian Williams (who is laughably in the battle against “fake news”), Hillary Clinton, ABC, CBS, The New York Times, The Washington Post, PBS, NPR, The BBC, The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago Tribune and others are fighting for their survival. The alternative media is now the enemy. “Fake news” accusations against the alternative media are the only weapon they have as the establishment and their MSM minions move forward in an attempt to censor the “real news.” The ghost of Joseph Goebbels whispers in the ears of the establishment and that is for them to “use all of its powers to repress dissent.” It will be an epic failure because the truth always finds its way.

Monday, July 17, 2017

Amazon.com and YouTube: Accessories After the Fact of Fraud and Theft by Deception


Amazon.com and YouTube: Accessories After the Fact of Fraud and Theft by Deception


When amazon.com bans books or YouTube takes down videos, there is the widespread perception that nothing can be done about it because they are private corporations. Because they are not “state actors”, they are generally believed to be entitled to take-downs of books and videos, even when those actions are capricious or arbitrary. But just as the Civil Rights Movement taught us, there are constraints on the actions of private entities when their actions violate state or federal laws. That is not permissible.

The pattern that has emerged from their recent practices of banning books and censoring YouTube videos about the purported Sandy Hook child shooting massacre of 14 December 2012, which the book, NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), and those YouTube videos demonstrate to have been a FEMA drill presented as a LIVE event, provides proof that amazon.com and YouTube have become accessories after the fact to fraud and theft by deception and therefore both appear to be liable to criminal prosecution.















In order to establish that amazon.com and YouTube are accessories after the fact, they have to be proven to have acted to assist parties (1) who have committed a felony, (2) after the party has committed the felony, (3) with knowledge that the party committed the felony, and (4) with the intent to help the party avoid arrest or punishment. An accessory after the fact may be held liable for, inter alia, obstruction of justice.

Felonies are crimes punishable by more than a year in prison or by death. In the case of Sandy Hook, participants assumed the roles of the survivors of victims of a shooting, which did not in fact take place. With the collusion of FEMA, the Connecticut State Police, the Medical Examiner and parties in the state and federal government, they ran a scam on the public and, by gaining their sympathy, received at least $28m in donations, $1.5m from the Lanza Estate and other items of value, including 65,000 Teddy Bears.

Assuming an equitable division between the surviving families of the twenty children and six adults who were alleged to have died at Sandy Hook, that is over $1m per family, which would be generally acknowledged to be quite a handsome take from feigning to have lost a child during a FEMA drill. And this does not take into account a $50m grant from the State of Connecticut to the Newtown School Board to build a new elementary school or other compensation to others who also participated in the elaborate charade.


When amazon.com banned NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), which includes chapters by thirteen (13) contributors, including six (6) current or retired Ph.D. college professors, demonstrating that the school had been closed by 2008 and was not compliant with state and federal laws under the Americans with Disabilities Act. It could not have been legally operating in CT in 2012, I released it to the public for free as a pdf, where it remains available to this day.

Our proof of fraud extends to the discovery of the FEMA manual for a 2-day event at Sandy Hook, with a rehearsal on the 13th, going LIVE on the 14th. Some of the participants became confused and put up donation sites a day early and, in spite of efforts to explain it away, Adam Lanza’s death was initially recorded inthe Social Security Death Index as having occurred on the 13th, making his feat in shooting 20 kids and 6 adults the following day all the more impressive.

Remarkably, Wolfgang Halbig's dogged pursuit of the truth resulted in the stunning admission, under oath, by Patricia Llorda, the First Selectman of Newtown (a position equivalent to Mayor), that the sign, "Everyone must check it!", was placed there by the Department of Homeland Security, which would not have been present had this not been a FEMA drill. (James Tracy has blogged about this, including the complete FEMA manual, which you can download there.)

Even the back cover includes proof that the celebrated photograph taken by Shannon Hicks, a photographer/editor for The Newtown Bee, was not taken during an emergency evacuation but was staged, where an earlier photo (she has also admitted to having taken) shows a purported “police woman” rearranging the kids in the line “to get a better shot” while multiple parents casually look on with their hands in their pockets and arms folded.
The YouTube videos that have been taken down include “The Real Deal must see Sandy Hook Update” (uploaded 5 February 2017) now removed:
















As Chance George had notified me, this has been one of my most popular videos about Sandy Hook, no doubt because it proves that nobody died:




















Another video of mine, “The Real Deal: Sandy Hook 2017 A NewWitness”, removed from the web site, American Nightmare, ostensibly for violating “Community Guidelines”; but when you compare the content of the video with the guidelines, there does not appear to be any violation thereof but extensive and detailed proof that “the Sandy Hook shooting” was a hoax.
















But when you consult YouTube’s stated policy on harassment and bullying,















none of it fits any of the content presented during this interview with a man, Jerry Lafreniere, a resident of Connecticut who knows the area well, who used to have lunch in the parking lot of the abandoned SHES school—unless exposing that Noah Pozner, for example, the most well-known of the alleged child victims, was created out of photographs of his purported older step-brother, Michael Vabner, as a child, constitutes a form of harassment:



No one who read the book, NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), or who watched the YouTube, “The Real Deal special MUST SEE Sandy Hook Update” or “The Real Deal: Sandy Hook 2017 A New Witness”, and understood their content could be unaware that the Sandy Hook shooting was an elaborate hoax. Indeed, the book includes the FBI Consolidated Statistics for Murder in 2012, which confirms that there were no murders in Newtown during 2012 and therefore none in Sandy Hook, a subdivision:















where this can be found on several pages of the book, including 166-167.

Lenny Pozner, who claims to be the father of Noah, has been aggressive in attacking web sites and students of Sandy Hook who have been doing their best to inform the public that Sandy Hook was an elaborate charade. Some such as James Tracy, formerly Associate Professor of Media and Mass Communications at Florida Atlantic University, have even paid for it with their positions because of baseless attacks appealing to popular beliefs about Sandy Hook, which may be sincerely held but are provably false.

And some of the nation’s leading institutions, such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, and even The Chronicle of Higher Education, have published articles about James Tracy based upon information they know to be false but publish anyway in reckless disregard of the truth to perpetuate this massive fraud on the American people, as I have demonstrated again and again and again. And this elaborate charade appears to be driven by the desire to advance the Barack Obama/Eric Holder gun-control agenda.

As the book explains, Eric Holder visited with Gov. Dannel Malloy on 27 November 2012, during which he appears to have informed him that they were going to take an abandoned school, conduct a drill and present it as a LIVE event to promote gun control. On 16 January 2013, Obama signed 23 executive orders to limit access to weapons under the 2nd Amendment. Joe Biden seems to have confided in the Mayor of Boston, Thomas Menino, that, “by January 2013, gun control in the US would be a done deal”:










where additional stunning confirmations have emerged since its publication that provide additional details about Sandy Hook, including an appearance by a “Sandy Hook father”, Neil Heslin, who contradicted the official story during the televised discussion between Megyn Kelly and Alex Jones and discovering a report by a planning expert to the Newtown School Board in 2010 that the falling birth rate in the community dictated that they did not have enough students to sustain all of the public schools in the community.

The pattern of suppression of information that would expose the fraud and theft by deception (of which amazon.com and YouTube cannot possibly be unaware) extends to other students of Sandy Hook, including those using the handles “PeeKay Truth”, “Barry Soetero” and “RedSilver J”, as Harold Saive informed me when YouTube’s crack down on research on Sandy Hook began to take a virulent form. While I was wrong to suggest this is a “clear violation of the First Amendement”, which applies to government actions in relation to the people, I had not yet come to the realization that they are accessories after the fact to crimes of fraud and theft by deception:


















As one example of the brilliant work they have performed, Barry Soetero discovered that one of the alleged “Sandy Hook parents”, David Wheeler,
was playing two roles at Sandy Hook, one as a grieving father, the other as a SWAT team member, walking up and down Dickinson Drive carrying his rifle upside down by the magazine. This was such blatant incompetence that it had to be taken down. Obama would fly him and his wife, Francine, to Washington to make an emotional address from the Oval Office, no less:















Since it is a federal crime to fly lobbyists on Air Force One, Barack Obama was violating the law flying David, Francine and other Sandy Hook parents to the District of Columbia. James Tracy has discovered that Francine was personal assistant to DNC Finance Chair, Maureen White, which provides further proof that this was a political event that was contrived to promote the Democratic Party’s gun control agenda, where the path was paved by nullifying the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948, which precluded using the same techniques of propaganda within the United States the CIA uses abroad.

For amazon.com and YouTube to be accessories after the fact to crimes of fraud and of theft by deception, those crimes must have been committed by the Sandy Hook players, including the parents, especially, who benefitted financially from generous donations by sympathetic but gullible Americans.
Consider the legal definition of “fraud”. Here is one for the crime of “fraud”:

Fraud. A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury.

Can there be any doubt that the Sandy Hook players, including the CT State Police, the Medical Examiner, and the parents, among others, were engaged in an elaborate fraud, which appears to have been planned by the Obama administration, even to the extent of nullifying the Smith-Mundt Act to make the use of propaganda and disinformation against the American people legal in the United States? Here is another for “theft by deception”:

Theft by deception generally means the use of deception to obtain control over the property or services of another. The following is an example of a state statute governing theft by deceptionTheft by deception. A person commits theft if he obtains property of another by deception.

We know that the book, NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), proves this was a two-day FEMA drill presented to the public as a live event. We know that no children or adults died there and that it was done to promote gun control. It was even confirmed by the Obama administration itself. As Ch. 6 explains, Paul Preston, who had conducted drills of this kind before, reached out to his contacts in the Obama Department of Education, who confirmed that it had been a drill, that no children had died and that it had been done to promote gun control. That leaves no doubt this was a fraud. 

Formal proof of fraud for legal purposes requires demonstrating that the defendant's actions involved five separate elements:

(1) a false statement of a material fact;
(2) knowledge on the part of the defendant that the statement is untrue; 
(3) intent on the part of the defendant to deceive the alleged victim;
(4) justifiable reliance by the alleged victim on the statement; and 
(5) injury to the alleged victim as a result.

In the case of the purported Sandy Hook parents, that does not appear to pose a challenge. They all knew they were participating in a scam and that their children had not died in a school schooling massacre. The all knew they were participating with the intent to deceive the public. They all knew that the donations coming from the public were based on false information. They all knew that the public was being deceived to benefit themselves.

Lenny Pozner even sent Kelley Watt a “death certificate” for Noah, which turned out to be a fabrication combining the bottom half of a real certificate with the top half of fake, which has no file number and even gives a wrong ETD (“Estimated Time of Death”) as 11 AM, when the shooting ostensibly took place between 9:30-9:35 AM. Obviously, if Noah had actually died, he would have had a real death certificate and would not have had to fake it:


Amazon.com and YouTube cannot have not known that the book and the videos they were banning and censoring provided proof that Sandy Hook was an elaborate charade. Read the book for yourself. Watch other videos that I have made about Sandy Hook, which leave no doubt about it. And if the question becomes of damages suffered, we not only have the public bamboozled out of at least $28,000,000 but NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015) had sold nearly 500 copies from the date it was placed on sale (22 October 2015) to the date it was removed (19 November 2015).

Just two days earlier, I had been contacted by a woman claiming to speak for Inside Edition, which was interested in covering our research on Sandy Hook. But they wanted to do a pre-interview—and I found myself in (what I now take was) a basement operation at Langley, where I was grilled about the book. In retrospect, I have no doubt that was evaluating our evidence to decide if it had to be banned. This appears to be more proof of the tight relationship between Jeff Bezos and the CIA, where he received a $600m contract from the agency that allowed him to purchase The Washington Post.

NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015) sold for $20 in black and white. (The 2nd edition is now available in color at moonrockbooks.com for $30.) 500 copies per month x $20 per copy equals $10,000 per month. If calculations of some personal financial damages matters in carrying a case against amazon.com, in particular, it would appear easy to satisfy at an estimated rate of $10,000 per month since November 2015, which as of today would equal about $200,000.

Given that the bulk of the gross (about 2/3 of the total) would have gone back to amazon.com (for distribution and handling) and to its subsidiary, Create Space (for production and administration), the motives behind banning books would have to be rather powerful, indeed. The net that then returns to us provides resources for the honoraria for our contributors and other expenses. The income from books like these are comparatively modest--but they are real.

My motive for publishing these books has never been to make money, but without revenue, we cannot publish more. The public deserves to know the truth about these events, which are being conducted as acts of feigned terrorism to instill fear into the American people to make us amenable to manipulation to promote a political agenda. It must come to an end. Join me in putting an end to the abuse of media by publishing falsehoods and suppressing truths about Sandy Hook. The future of our nation is at stake.

Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus on the Duluth Camps of the University of Minnesota. He edited NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015) and its 2nd edition at moonrockbooks.com.

Note: There are other, more extensive and detailed, definitions of both kinds of offense, which make the offenses involved apparent, such as:

n. the intentional use of deceit, a trick or some dishonest means to deprive another of his/her/its money, property or a legal right. A party who has lost something due to fraud is entitled to file a lawsuit for damages against the party acting fraudulently, and the damages may include punitive damages as a punishment or public example due to the malicious nature of the fraud. Quite often there are several persons involved in a scheme to commit fraud and each and all may be liable for the total damages. Inherent in fraud is an unjust advantage over another which injures that person or entity. It includes failing to point out a known mistake in a contract or other writing (such as a deed), or not revealing a fact which he/she has a duty to communicate, such as a survey which shows there are only 10 acres of land being purchased and not 20 as originally understood. Constructive fraud can be proved by a showing of breach of legal duty (like using the trust funds held for another in an investment in one's own business) without direct proof of fraud or fraudulent intent. Extrinsic fraud occurs when deceit is employed to keep someone from exercising a right, such as a fair trial, by hiding evidence or misleading the opposing party in a lawsuit. Since fraud is intended to employ dishonesty to deprive another of money, property or a right, it can also be a crime for which the fraudulent person(s) can be charged, tried and convicted. Borderline overreaching or taking advantage of another's naiveté involving smaller amounts is often overlooked by law enforcement, which suggests the victim seek a "civil remedy" (i.e., sue). However, increasingly fraud, which has victimized a large segment of the public (even in individually small amounts), has become the target of consumer fraud divisions in the offices of district attorneys and attorneys general.